![]() ![]() His own book, Monuments on Mars: A City on the Edge of Forever (to be published next year by Grossinger’s North Atlantic Books) is a voluminous study of the search for life on Mars since the nineteenth century, the various space missions and their discoveries, and the different scenarios and interpretations of the “face.” Hoagland, who helped design the Pioneer 10 Plaque - humankind’s first interstellar message - is as knowledgeable as he is impassioned about Mars. What follows is an edited version of Grossinger’s interview - which appears in its entirety in Planetary Mysteries - with Richard Hoagland, reporter and science writer and former consultant to Walter Cronkite and CBS News. If not, if the “face” is artificial - left behind, perhaps, by intelligent beings from outside the solar system - now isn’t too soon to start asking why. If so, no one will be laughing but us lonely humans. And I’ll confess to some ambivalence about printing this: I’m sure the “face” isn’t a hoax, but it may turn out to be a big joke, just another pile of rocks, about as historic a discovery as the man in the moon. Certainly many reputable scientists have dismissed the “face” as a play of light and shadow. Perhaps even more extraordinary than this “proof” of extraterrestrial intelligence is the capacity of humankind to deceive itself. It now appears that one of those probes may have turned up something after all - a discovery so improbable, so controversial, so mind-boggling, that NASA and the scientific establishment have disclaimed it, and it’s been left to a group of maverick scientists to sort through the scanty but highly suggestive data that points to the existence of a carved, mile-high, upward-looking human “face” on Mars and an adjoining “city” of pyramids. Planetary Mysteries by Richard Grossinger has rekindled my interest, to put it mildly. Either “they” would find us, or it would be quite a while before we could extend the search to other stars. But as one planetary probe after another turned up nothing but rocks or swirling, poisonous gases - no life and no evidence of any ancient civilizations, at least in our own solar system - I lost interest. Common sense suggests it (as well as every science fiction book I’ve read since I was twelve). “If there was water, we can assume that the atmosphere was suitable for the origin of life or that the weather conditions on Mars were favorable during the last billion years,” said the Chinese Academy of Sciences in a statement.I’ve never doubted there was life on other planets. A Chinese rover revealed not too long ago the “recent” presence of water. To this day, we cannot confirm the possibility of life on Mars, but scientists are determined to scrutinize the red planet to unravel all its mysteries. “There is a hill with a collapsed V-shaped structure (the nose), two craters (the eyes), and a circular pattern (the head),” says geologist Alfred McEwen on the University of Arizona website. Instead, in this unusual shot, we see two craters and a hill, which draw the face of a brown bear. Proof of this is this picture of a “bear” that has since gone around the world. in collaboration with the University of Arizona’s Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, is capable of capturing images of the Martian surface in great detail. The instrument, built and developed by Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. 25, NASA shared a photograph captured by the HiRISE high-resolution camera housed on board the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) spacecraft.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |